Students learn in the dark
They open ChatGPT in private and resolve their doubts with an AI that doesn't know the syllabus, doesn't cite sources, and isn't accountable. The silence of the classroom, multiplied by a thousand.
AI for education
We bring AI
into the classroom.
Dialogia makes visible how students think with AI — and gives teachers back control of the learning process. Students use it well, teachers see the process, and the institution keeps data sovereignty.
- 100%
- of the process, visible
- EU
- cloud · GDPR · no-training
- Live
- in real classrooms
- 2
- tools, one mission
Implemented at
02 / Tools
Two tools. One mission.
Classroom makes visible how each student works with AI. Questions turns the teacher's materials into a tutor that only cites what the institution validates.
Group projects with AI
Dialogia Classroom
dialogia.org/classroomThe teacher launches a project. Students work on it in groups with AI under rules. The teacher sees the reasoning, the prompts, and each person's real contribution.
Video preview blocked until you accept third-party content.
- 3 levels of AI assistance per activity
- Group work with shared and private chat
- Individual, evidence-based assessment
Real-time class Questions
Dialogia Questions
dialogia.org/questionsThe teacher uploads their materials. Students converse with them by chat or voice. A NotebookLM governed by the institution, with citations to the exact document.
Video preview blocked until you accept third-party content.
- Answers only from validated course material
- Anonymity: breaks the silence of the classroom
- Weekly report of doubts to the teacher
The problem
The learning process has become opaque.
AI is already in the classroom — but it comes in through the back door. Students don't use it well, and teachers see nothing of the process.
Teachers grade blind
They receive an assignment and don't know how much the student thought and how much the AI thought. Without visible reasoning, there's no real assessment.
Institutions lose sovereignty
Academic materials and conversations live on third-party servers, beyond the institution's control. Shadow AI with no policy, no contract, no return to the institution.
No one — student, teacher, institution — has visibility into how the next generation is actually learning.
The solution
Dialogia brings AI into the classroom as a visible part of learning.
It's not about resisting AI — it's about governing it. Three pillars hold up everything we do.
Precision RAG
The AI answers only with the materials the teacher validates. It cites the page and slide. If it's not in the syllabus, it doesn't make it up.
Visible pedagogy
We turn private interactions into pedagogical analytics: which topics confuse, which slides fail, who contributes what.
Data sovereignty
European cloud, GDPR by contract, guaranteed no-training. The institution owns the intelligence it generates.
How Classroom works
The teacher decides how much AI the student can use.
Each activity launches with a work mode. The AI adapts its behavior and assessment takes the rules into account.
🤝
Assisted
“Co-write with me”
Students can lean on the AI freely — it can generate full paragraphs or complete drafts. They supervise, critique, and decide.
⚖️
Balanced
“Let's think together”
The default. The AI is a thinking partner: it suggests, gives feedback, helps structure, and rewrites specific fragments on request.
✏️
Strict
“Only if I ask”
Ideas and writing are 100% the student's. The AI only helps with spelling, grammar, synonyms, or paraphrasing what they've already written.
🏛️
Socratic
“Discover it yourself”
The AI never gives the answer directly. Instead, it asks questions that help the student think, reflect, and reach their own conclusions.
Per activity, the teacher can also let students attach their own documents (PDF, DOCX…) and enable web search with cited sources.
Built-in guardrail
When a student tries to shortcut the thinking, everyone sees it.
If a message goes against the activity's mode — like asking the AI to “just give me the answer” in Socratic mode — Dialogia flags it before it's sent, explains why, and logs the attempt for the teacher. The AI still won't hand over the answer. Misuse becomes visible, not invisible.
- A real-time nudge back on task — the student can rephrase or send anyway.
- Every attempt is logged and attributed to the student.
- The model holds the line: in Socratic mode it keeps asking, never answers.
Ethics of AI · class debateSocratic mode
Should our school use facial recognition to take attendance? Take a position and defend it.
This message may go against the activity's mode
You can send it anyway: it will be logged for your teacher, and the AI will keep answering with questions, not with conclusions.
You are asking the AI to decide for you and to set the limits of the debate. In Socratic mode it is you who builds the arguments and reaches the conclusion.
Your message
Just tell me whether it is right or wrong, give me the three best arguments and where to draw the line, so I can write my essay.
Cancel and rephraseSend anyway
Real participation %
Active time, prompts made, contribution in shared vs private chat.
Prompt traceability
Every interaction with the AI is logged and attributed to the student who made it.
Evidence-based assessment
Automatic rubrics that cross the final work with the individual process.
Differentiation
No one competes where we are.
| ChatGPT / NotebookLM | Moodle / Canvas + plug-ins | Dialogia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | Individual productivity | Administrative management | Living classroom with AI |
| Source of truth | Internet + whatever the student uploads | Static documents | Teacher-validated material |
| Teacher visibility | Black box · 0% | Final submissions only | Full process · 100% |
| Off-mode use | Unrestricted | Not detected | Flagged, logged & held in check |
| Institutional data | Trains commercial models | Variable servers | EU · No training · First-party |
| Buyer | Student (B2C) | University CIO | Vice-Rectorate for Teaching |
Validated in the real classroom
Born in classrooms, proven in the real world.
“I liked how Dialogia asked questions and initiated conversations rather than just agreeing with me like ChatGPT or Claude AI would. This helped push my thinking and sometimes change my mind, calling out my personal biases and guiding my decision making into new directions.”
“It helped me develop my own answers instead of just giving me an answer that I didn't learn from.”
“I really appreciate that it continues to push you deeper even after answering the questions. There were times I would answer the question that it asked me, but when it encouraged deeper thinking is when I really started to understand the concepts.”
Business model
Transparent pricing, no surprises.
Institutional B2B SaaS. Each course = 6 ECTS, unlimited students, everything included. Up to 20 courses/year at public pricing; beyond that, a negotiated institutional license.
Dialogia Classroom — public rate
Starting from
€100/ course
+ €10/ student / semester
Each course = 6 ECTS · unlimited students · everything included.
€20
/ student / semester in an average class
100%
usage included · no overages
>90%
expected retention
Everything included
- Unlimited access to Dialogia Classroom + Questions
- Faculty training · onboarding
- Implementation support and guidance
- Custom admin dashboard
- Governed AI profiles maintained by Dialogia
€20/student/semester in an average class — competitive vs ChatGPT/Gemini consumer ($20/mo), but governed by the institution.
Dialogia Questions — standalone
€60/ course · semester
up to 60 student enrolments (hard cap) · Beyond that: blocks of 10 participants for €7.50/block (paid upfront, not prorated)
Already on Classroom? Questions is included at no extra cost.
Estimate your price
Classroom pricing (Questions is included)
5
40
Cost per semester
€2,500
≈ €13 per student / semester
Book a demoMore than 10 courses, or a whole institution? Ask us for a tailored institutional proposal.
Pricing counts enrolments, not people: a student enrolled in three courses takes a seat in each of them.
Up to 20 courses/year at public pricing.
Team · three co-founders
Three professors who live the problem from the classroom.
We weren't born in a lab. We were born in real classrooms that demanded a solution that didn't exist.
Néstor Lázaro
Business Development
PhD candidate in Industrial Engineering. 10+ years in educational entrepreneurship, university teaching, and entrepreneur training.
Jordi Morales
CTO · Chief Technical Officer
PhD in Computational Sociology. 10+ years researching AI and teaching in university settings.
Amaia Pz. de Arriluzea
CPO · Chief Product Officer
PhD candidate in Computational Sociolinguistics. 7+ years researching AI, with direct classroom teaching experience.
FAQ
Questions, answered.
The things schools and universities ask us most. Can't find yours? Book a demo and ask us directly.
Yes. Everything runs on EU cloud, is GDPR-compliant, and we never train models on your data. The institution keeps data sovereignty while Dialogia maintains governed AI profiles for quality, privacy, multilingual support, cost and compliance.
A public opportunity
Lead the transition to a classroom with AI that's integrated, transparent, and teacher-governed.
Dialogia doesn't compete against AI — it integrates it into the classroom under the control of the teacher and the institution. Position your institution as a European reference in responsible adoption of educational AI.